K-House Africa

New

Articles

Price List

 Kings High Way Briefing Packs

Topical Teachings

DVD Briefing Back Packs

Audio CD

Audio MP3 Collections

DVD Commentaries

Strategic Trends

Verse By Verse Commentaries

Personal Update

Donations

New Product Notice

FAQ

Contact US

K-House USA

 Africa news

Comment Line

K-House eNews
 For The Week Of 16 July 2008
 

New Front Page Update

Articles and Commentary


INTERNATIONAL NEWS FEEDS

News feeds updated continuously

  • Pakistan in Peril
  • Radical Islam in China
  • Pro-Controversy Act Made Law in Louisiana

Get the latest report on Zimbabwe.

Important News Headlines

Memory Verse of the Week

16th

622 - The beginning of the Islamic calendar.

1054 - Three Roman legates fractured relations between the Western and Eastern Christian churches by placing an invalid Papal Bull of Excommunication on the altar in the Hagia Sophia during Saturday afternoon divine liturgy. This is often dated as the start of the East-West Schism.

1931 - Emperor Haile Selassie of Ethiopia signs the first constitution of Ethiopia.

1942 - Holocaust: Rafle du Vel'd'Hiv: The Vichy France government orders French police officers to round up 13,000-20,000 Jews and imprison them in the Winter Velodrome. In 1995, president Jacques Chirac officially recognizes the French police's responsibility.  

 1945 - Manhattan Project: The Atomic Age begins when the United States successfully detonates a plutonium-based test nuclear weapon at the Trinity site near Alamogordo, New Mexico.

1948 - The city of Nazareth, hometown of Jesus, capitulated to Israeli troops during Operation Dekel led by Ben Dunkelman, after little more than token resistance, during 1948 Arab-Israeli War.

1969 - Apollo program: Apollo 11 is launched from Cape Kennedy, Florida and will become the first manned space mission to land on the moon.

1979 - Iraqi President Hasan al-Bakr resigns and is replaced by Saddam Hussein.

1999 - John F. Kennedy Jr., his wife Carolyn Bessette Kennedy, and sister-in-law Lauren Bessette are killed in a plane crash off the coast of Martha's Vineyard. The Piper Saratoga aircraft was piloted by Kennedy.

17th

180 - Twelve inhabitants of Scillium in North Africa executed for being Christians. This is the earliest record of Christianity in that part of the world.

1203 - Fourth Crusade captures Constantinople by assault; the Byzantine emperor Alexius III Angelus flees from his capital into exile.

1686 - A meeting takes place at Lüneburg between several Protestant powers in order to discuss the formation of an 'evangelical' league of defence, called the 'Confederatio Militiae Evangelicae', against the Catholic League.

1815 - Napoleonic Wars: In France, Napoleon surrenders at Rochefort, Charente-Maritime to British forces.

1918 - By order of the Bolshevik Party and carried out by Cheka, Emperor Nicholas II of Russia, his immediate family, and retainers were murdered at the Ipatiev House in Ekaterinburg, Russia.

1936 - Spanish Civil War: An Armed Forces rebellion against the recently-elected leftist Popular Front government of Spain starts the Spanish civil war.

1998 - Papua New Guinea earthquake: A tsunami triggered by an undersea earthquake destroys 10 villages in Papua New Guinea killing an estimated 3,183, leaving 2,000 more unaccounted for and thousands more homeless.

 

***BRAND NEW RELEASE'S***


Strategic Perspectives 111

California Conference

Various Speakers

Southern California Strategic Perspectives Conference 2008. Intelligence, insight, and inspiration. The following nine speakers bring you up to date on strategic perspectives.

  • Session 1- Joseph Farah   Weeping For Talmuz
  • Session 2- Dr. Chuck Missler  The Boundaries of Reality
  • Session 3- Dennis Agajanian   Special Music
  • Session 4-Joel Rosenberg   All Eyes on the Epicenter
  • Session 5-Paul McGuire  Signs Of The Times
  • Session 6- Dr. Tim LaHaye  God's Merciful Acts In Revelation
  • Session 7-Ray Comfort   A Nation In Distress
  • Session 8-Dr. Bob Cornuke   Lessons From The Ledge
  • Session 9-Gen. Shimon Erem  Israel At 60: What Does The Future Hold
  • Session 10-Walid Shoebat  Islam In The Bible
 

In May of 2008, these remarkable men met for a two day conference to impart information, insight and inspiration. Never has it been more important to remain up to date on what is really happening in the world. This conference will help you to be like the Sons of Issachar, who understood the times and knew what their country should do. Stay aware, stay informed and be not deceived!

DVD Price R 499.00

Add To Cart |>>>/ More information


Updated Hebrews Study:

Pressing On To Maturity

By Chuck Missler

 

 

The Epistle to the Hebrews is one of the two greatest theological treatises of the New Testament.1 This letter is, in a real sense, the “Leviticus” of the New Testament, detailing how the Lord Jesus Christ is both the fulfillment and the successor to all that had gone on before.

The extreme dilemma of the Jewish Christians—especially while the Temple was still standing—was their extreme predicament. They had been drawn from a divinely appointed religion, with divinely appointed priests officiating in a divinely appointed Temple, accomplishing a divinely ordered service, all of which had been ennobled throughout their entire history.

How could believing priests and Pharisees remain “zealous of the Law”? This letter was clearly aimed at the people who were now Christians but had come out of Judaism. It focuses on the background that they came from, and tries to demonstrate how Jesus was a fulfillment of those things; in fact, he superseded those things. Jesus is the very fulfillment of the Old Testament.

The author of Hebrews had three main objectives: 1) Combat possible apostasy (Heb 2:1-4; 10:19-25); 2) Encourage them to press on to spiritual maturity (Heb 5:11-14; 10:32-39); and, 3) Comfort them in their persecutions (Heb 11:1-12:3). His method was to highlight the superiority of the Messiah to the three pillars of Judaism: angels, Moses, and the Levitical priesthood. The contrasts were not between bad and good (both are from God); but between good and better. He deviates from his logical arguments to include five major warnings—which offer some interesting insights.

Authorship

Who wrote the book of Hebrews? Hebrews is an unsigned book and there are many theories, but the available evidence, we feel, seems to justify a Pauline ascription.

Apollos? Some suggest that Apollos wrote this epistle, although there is not much evidence to support the theory. Furthermore, Apollos was from Alexandria, and yet even in Alexandria in the earliest times the book was associated with Paul. So, if Apollos was the author, somehow he didn’t even convince his own hometown.

Barnabas? Others ascribe the book to Barnabas, but here again there is no evidence to support this theory. There are some spurious writings (that are not regarded as authentic) that were attributed to Barnabas, but their style is so different from the Epistle to the Hebrews that if one can conclude that the writings attributed to Barnabas were at all indicative of Barnabas’ style, he clearly didn’t write the Epistle to the Hebrews.

Paul? There are many stylistic reasons that point to its Pauline authorship.

Paul’s Special Mark

If one recognizes that there were apparently forgeries of Thessalonians letters being circulated, then several passages become clearer. Thus at the end of that letter, Paul includes a sort of special mark, a token:

The salutation of Paul with mine own hand, which is the token in every epistle: so I write.
 

2 Thessalonians 3:17

Note how Paul is emphasizing that he has signed the letter with his own hand (most were probably drafted by an amanuensis or secretary). He would include a sign at the end so they would know that the letter was really from him.

So what is this signature or style item that is included in every letter? The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen (2 Thess 3:18). And how does Hebrews end? Grace be with you all. Amen (Heb 13:25). Why is this so impressive of Paul’s style? Because the word “Grace” does not even appear in the other epistles!4

The Trilogy on Habakkuk 2:4

The key verse in Habakkuk is: The Just shall live by faith (Hab 2:4). This verse became the primary banner that inflamed the Reformation. It would seem that Paul penned a deliberate trilogy on this very verse:

Who are “The Just”? The Book of Romans answers the question (Cf. Rom 1:17). How then “Shall [they] Live”? Galatians shows how we are to live—called out of religious externalism (Cf. Gal 3:11).

“By faith...” What is the epistle on “faith”? This Epistle to the Hebrews (Cf. Heb 10:38)!

As a former systems engineer and technologist in the information sciences, I tend to favour evidences that reveal an architecture and integrity of design, and it is this unique characteristic of the entire Bible that has been the foundation of our ministry.

Thus, it is the apparent trilogy of Romans, Galatians and He-brews, dealing specifically with Habakkuk 2:4, that causes us to lean strongly on the inference that Hebrews was authored by Paul. (If it should turn out that it was by another, then this very design becomes an even more impressive “fingerprint” of the Holy Spirit!)

Other Stylistic Evidences

In Romans 8:35-39, Paul lists a number of things that can't separate you from the love of Christ. He lists seven things, and then 10 more, for a total of 17.

In Hebrews 12:18-24 we find a similar list: Again there are seven things, and then 10 more, for a total of 17. And in Galatians 5:19-21 there is also a list of 17 things. (Again, it is Romans, Galatians, and Hebrews that evidence a similarity of style.)

Paul also favored the Greek word, uio,j huios, “sons,” rather than a similar Greek word, te,knon teknon, which other writers use, which means “children.” The “witness of the Holy Spirit,” discussed in Romans 8:16 and Hebrews 10:15 also hints at a common authorship. And in Hebrews 13:18, the writer says, “Pray for us.” There is only one epistle writer that makes that specific request: none other than Paul.

The Role of Timothy

In Chapter 13 of Hebrews, there is a reference that notes that the writer of the Epistle to the Hebrews was accompanied by Timothy. We know from a number of epistles that Timothy accompanied Paul. We do not have any record of him accompanying anyone else. While that does not mean that Timothy exclusively accompanied Paul, we do not have any evidence of him accompanying any other writer.

Why Anonymous?

So if Paul did write the book, why would he keep it anonymous? From Acts 9:15 we know that Paul was the apostle to the Gentiles. While the Gentiles were his primary mission field, he also had an intense burden for his own brethren. Looking at Paul’s life, it is clear that Paul would sooner or later write an epistle to the Hebrews.

So why would he write one and keep it anonymous? Because every time he tried to address them there were riots. He never recovered the confidence of the Jewish side; they reputed his apostleship and also feared his attack against their ancient rituals and ceremonies.

Nowhere in the book of Hebrews does Paul assert his apostle-ship, unlike his other epistles, but instead he builds his entire thesis uniquely from basic Jewish arguments from Old Testament passages. He exalts Christ, not his own apostleship.

There are reasons in the text that we could infer that the book was probably written after Paul’s first imprisonment, but before his second arrest.8 It was clearly written prior to the destruction of the Temple in 70 A.D. The impending destruction of the Temple may have been one of the reasons that God had Paul show them how they needed, as Christian believers, not only to accept Christ, but to come out of Judaism.9

Peter’s Testimony

Peter also seems to allude to this letter in 2 Peter 3:15-16:

And account that the long suffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you...
 

2 Peter 3:15

Peter here ascribes a letter written by Paul to the Hebrews. But the other 13 Pauline epistles all went to Gentile churches. So if Hebrews was not written by Paul, then there is a missing letter written by Paul to the Hebrews.

As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
 

2 Peter 3:16

Here Peter is commenting on Paul’s letter, saying that Paul had written some things that were hard to understand (indeed, the difficulties in Hebrews 6 and 10).

Pressing On To Maturity

The primary focus of this letter to believers is to press on to spiritual maturity. For anyone serious about their spiritual growth, both the Epistle to the Romans and the Epistle to the Hebrews are absolutely essential to thoroughly understand. Is there any priority or commitment that is more important—or urgent—in your own life? Pray about it.


A Glimpse of Hebrews, Part 2:

A Major Biblical Enigma

by Chuck Missler

  

The Epistle to the Hebrews is widely regarded as one of the most difficult of books, enigmatic to those who fail to recognize the status of (and the issues confronting) the specific readers who are being addressed. In our previous article on this challenging book, we focused on the mysteries surrounding its authorship and its role in the Trilogy on Habakkuk 2:4.1

But perhaps the most disturbing concern seems to center around its ostensible attack on the eternal security of the believer, particularly in the lengthy sentence in Hebrews 6:

For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.
Hebrews 6:4-6

Since the readers of this Epistle were definitely saved believers, this would seem to create a paradox regarding eternal security.

Exegetical Analysis

The exegesis2 of the Greek grammar is very challenging: the long sentence consists of a string of participles that modify the adjective “impossible.”3 This impossibility is modified, however, by two continuous action participles.4 The grammar of the pas-sage connotes that the main verb of the sentence (i.e., the verb “to be”) and the descriptive aorist participles that modify it in verses 4-5 are all limited and defined by the present tense of the participles in verse 6.

After a person stops those two actions, at which time those behaviors become past tense activities as soon as they are ceased, the impossibility of renewal or restoration no longer applies, since they no longer are present tense activities relating to the word “impossible.”

However, in any case, the impossibility referred to is an impossibility to restore repentance, not to restore salvation, and the restoration of the repentance is connoted by the verbs as occur-ring only during the time of the various verbs described by the two present participles. Once these two present actions cease, the impossibility is removed. Thus, neither permanent loss of repentance (let alone any loss of salvation, for that matter) is mentioned in this verse.

Beyond the exegetical technicalities of the Greek, however, there is an even more basic issue involved: whose “repentance” is in view?

The Crisis at Kadesh-Barnea

The writer of the Epistle continually relies on the crisis at Kadesh-Barnea (Numbers 13 and 14) to draw his primary in-sights: Israel’s lack of faith at the threatening report of ten (of the twelve) spies caused them to balk at entering the Land. Their lack of faith deeply grieved the Lord, of course.

What is widely overlooked, however, is that they were for-given.5 However, they still were disinherited,6 because of a sworn oath,7 and that is the key point by the writer in several of the issues addressed in the Epistle.8

The writer applies the same argument regarding the “repentance” that was not available to Esau,9 who “found no place of repentance though he sought it carefully with tears.”10 Let’s realize that the word for “repentance” (meta,noia metanoia), refers to a change of mind, as it appears to one who repents of a purpose he has formed or of something he has done. It was Isaac’s repentance that was lacking, not Esau’s.

So it also seems possible that in Hebrews 6, it may be God whose repentance is in view, not the readers’. Even though forgiveness may be granted, it could be God who does not “change His mind” regarding the inheritance issue since He had sworn an oath regarding the matter. This is a provocative alternative perspective to reflect upon.

An Amicus Brief?

There is an unusual concept available in our law courts: an Amicus curiae, a friend of the court. This refers to a bystander who interposes and volunteers information upon some matter to which the judge may be doubtful or mistaken, or when there is a danger of doing a wrong thing. Such a “third party”—not a direct party in interest—can offer an Amicus brief, as a friend of the court, for whatever assistance it may provide.

Paul was, in a sense, in that kind of a position. Since he regarded Jesus Christ as The Apostle to the Jews,11 and since Paul was specifically called as the apostle to the Gentiles,12 to officially step in and address Jewish believers could constitute a kind of presumptuous supererogation.

This would also explain why he deliberately left the epistle unsigned. He simply put forth a series of self-sufficient arguments which rely on the very Scriptures his audience was bound to accept as authoritative. If appended with Paul’s signature, this could have negatively prejudiced Jewish believers (much as it still does to Judaizers to this very day!)

The critical issue before the readers was not their salvation: it was their inheritance! They were to press on to spiritual maturity: to become a metachoi, a partaker, an overcomer. There are at least five specific warnings in this epistle that build on each other to hammer home that crucial theme.

Are you a metachoi?13 If not, how do you become one? What do you miss if you don’t?

The Scripture says that, in heaven, God shall wipe away all tears from our eyes.14 Why are there any tears in heaven? (There are no shortages, no lack of the knowledge of God, no death, no sorrow, no pain, etc.) Why are there any tears at all?